The Nightmare Politics and Sticky Science of Hacking the Climate

And exactly how much carbon they remove can vary quite a bit based on variables like the health of the vegetation. “One of the major risks of some of these biology-based proposals is that an assumption gets made that you can easily equate X number of trees to X million tons of carbon without actually looking at what kinds of trees they are, and where they’re being planted,” says Cox. The amount of captured carbon might end up being negligible. “You have a lot of trees, which is brilliant. You haven’t necessarily got the climate benefits.”

Another technique known as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, or BECCS, also relies

→ Continue reading at Wired - Science

More from author

Related posts

Advertisment

Latest posts

Why You Need to Be an Influencer Brand and the 3 Rs of Becoming One

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. The "three Rs "concept has arisen around the idea of influence in the social...

Hybrid, Remote Work or Flexible Hours? Know Your Team and What Motivates Them

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Executives, project leaders and managers in the technology and software development industry have always...

Clif Bar billionaires reap 2,400% gain by rebuffing early buyout

By Josephine Walker | BloombergGary Erickson was offered a tantalizing sum from Quaker Oats in 2000 to sell Clif Bar & Co., his upstart...