What it means for the election that the government can talk to tech companies

A right-wing legal and political campaign has disrupted the work of government agencies meant to safeguard voting and subjected researchers studying online harms to harassment and death threats. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday that the government can communicate with social media companies about controversial content sidestepped deciding when such communications can violate the First Amendment. Still, it answers a pressing question in an election year about the extent to which the government and tech firms can share information about foreign influence campaigns intended to sway American voters.

More from author

Related posts

Advertisment

Latest posts

Harvard’s antisemitism and anti-Muslim task forces urge the university: Act soon | CNN Business

CNN  —  Two presidential task forces formed to recommend how Harvard can combat antisemitism and anti-Muslim, anti-Arab and...

This company is stressing skills over college degrees. CNN correspondent explains why | CNN Business

This company is stressing skills over college degrees. CNN correspondent explains why CNN’s Athena Jones speaks with Debbie Dyson, CEO of OneTen, and Amari...

US new home sales plunged unexpectedly last month | CNN Business

Washington CNN  —  Sales of newly built homes dropped last month as mortgage rates remained elevated. New...