Supreme Court ruling on ‘conversion therapy’ puts medical talk in the hot seat

Medical care isn’t just tests and procedures. It’s discussing diagnoses, chatting about health behaviors and conducting psychotherapy. Legally, speech related to medical care has been considered conduct, so it’s subject to state laws that regulate the practice of medicine.

But on March 31, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that some speech related to medical care is different. In ruling on Chiles v. Salazar, an 8 to 1 majority wrote that talk therapy is speech, not conduct. Therefore, regulation of a therapist’s speech could run afoul of the First Amendment, which protects free speech. Specifically, the case looks at whether talk-based “conversion therapy” for minors can be prohibited. This practice,

Related News

How to Overcome Imposter Syndrome and Launch Your First Product with Confidence

Intel was on the brink of downfall. A twist in the AI race could boost its revival

Incident involving suspect with a knife closes Hwy. 101 in San Jose

Scott Pelley speaks: ‘CBS News is on fire’ and Bari Weiss should be removed

5 vehicles stolen from Alameda County parking garage in Oakland

Video footage shows large groups of people fighting in Oakland