Supreme Court ruling on ‘conversion therapy’ puts medical talk in the hot seat

Medical care isn’t just tests and procedures. It’s discussing diagnoses, chatting about health behaviors and conducting psychotherapy. Legally, speech related to medical care has been considered conduct, so it’s subject to state laws that regulate the practice of medicine.

But on March 31, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that some speech related to medical care is different. In ruling on Chiles v. Salazar, an 8 to 1 majority wrote that talk therapy is speech, not conduct. Therefore, regulation of a therapist’s speech could run afoul of the First Amendment, which protects free speech. Specifically, the case looks at whether talk-based “conversion therapy” for minors can be prohibited. This practice,

Related News

Prediction Markets Let You Bet on Whether a Wildfire Will Burn Down Your Town

What Are Fish Oil Supplements Good For? Here’s Your Crash Course

Workers claim unsafe conditions at a restaurant owned by the South Park creators. They have Brooke Shields on their side

Trump Accounts are now live. Here’s what you need to know

How I Went From Side Hustle to 7 Figures in 12 Months Using 4 AI Tools (No Employees, No Investors)

AI Can Do a Lot — But Most Companies Don’t Want It Talking to Their Clients. Here’s Why.